The cell migration (top) and invasion (bottom) assays indicated that MICAL2 did not promote migration or invasion in A549

 
W. Zhou, et al. Cancer Letters 483 (2020) 75–86 -ΔC −ΔC Fig.5. ComparedtoMICAL2,MICAL2 hadlesspromotingeffectonproliferationandmobilityinLUADcells in vitroandmetastasis in vivo:A.MICAL2 −ΔC andMICAL2wereexpressedintransfectedA549cells.Myosin-9wasenhancedinbothA549-MICAL2 andA549-MICAL2cellscomparedwithA549-CTRLcells.B. −ΔC A549-MICAL2 showed a significant increase in proliferation compared with A549-CTRL, while at a significantly lower level compared with A549-MICAL2 cells. −ΔC C. The cell migration (top) and invasion (bottom) assays indicated that MICAL2 did not promote migration or invasion in A549 as in MICAL2-WT cells. D. 

 

Representativeimagesoflungmetastaticnodules(circlesmarkedwithpartoftumormetastaticfocus)derivedfromA549cellswithorwithoutstablyoverexpressing ΔC −ΔC MICAL2- or MICAL2. A549-MICAL2 showed a significant increase in metastatic nodule number while A549-MICAL2 did not (n = 4, *** = P < 0 Mitomycin C.001). In addition, several articles report that myosin-9 promoted tumor- and ML7. Furthermore, its nuclear export is necessary for its tumor- igenesis by regulating AKT signaling [40–43]. AKT is a key signaling promoting effect. Myosin-9 inhibitor together with a short chain poly- nodeconnecting oncogenic proteinstotumor-promoting effects inlung peptidetargetingtheNESofMICAL2mightbeanalternatestrategyfor cancers [44–47] cck8 molecular weight. In the present study, MICAL2 was corelated with inhibiting the carcinogenesis of MICAL2. myosin-9expressionandp-AKTlevels(Fig.2G).Ourstudyalsoshowed The mechanisms by which nuclear-exported MICAL2 affects cell that myosin-9 bound to MICAL2 and promoted MICAL2 nuclear export migration capacity vary. First, MICAL2 directly binds and disassembles (Fig. 4), which facilitated MICAL2\'s participation in oncogenic pro- F-actin as an oxidation-reduction enzyme [9,10,19]. 

 

Cytoplasmic cesses.ThisalsoreducedtheinfluenceofMICAL2inthenucleus,which MICAL2 is colocalized withF-actin at theedge oflamellipodia [18,19]. may in turn have prevented excessive MYH9 expression. In short, the Accordingly, migration and invasion abilities were strongly inhibited MICAL2-SRF-MYH9-AKT pathway may exist in LUAD cell lines and with the depletion of cytoplasmic MICAL2 in LUAD (Fig CORM-3. 6). In might be self-regulated by myosin-9\'s promotion of MICAL2 nuclear addition, myosin-9 is overexpressed in lung cancers and attenuates −ΔC export. Nevertheless, more evidence is needed to draw this conclusion. NSLC metastasis [39,49]. In the present study, MICAL2 —enriched The subcellular location of proteins is an essential factor de- in the nucleus—led to higher levels of myosin-9 expression (Fig. 5A), termining the efficiency of various biological processes [48]. In this while it had no significant effect on cell motility in LUAD cells (Fig. 6C study, MICAL2 was determined to be a nucleoplasm shuttling protein, and D). On one hand, this indicates that cytoplasmic MICAL2 is crucial relyingonitsC-terminalendandmyosin-9whilebeingsensitivetoLMB for its motility-promoting effect in LUADs. On the other hand, it raises 83
W. Zhou, et al. Cancer Letters 483 (2020) 75–86 Fig.6. RestraintofMICAL2nuclearexportinhibitedtheproliferation,migration,andinvasioninLUADcells:ML7(A),LMB(B),andsi-myosin-9(C)inhibited the proliferation of both A549-MICAL2 and A549-CTRL cells at a significantly higher rate in the MICAL2-overexpressed A549 cells. A549-MICAL2 and A549-CTRL wereinhibitedinbothmigrationcapacity(D,F)andinvasiveness(E,G)byML7,LMB,orsi-myosin-9.TheinhibitionratesinA549-MICAL2weresignificantlyhigher than in A549-CTRL after treatment. 84
r>

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Identification of monensin as a potent MYB inhibitor. A. Schematic illus- tration of the HEK-MYB-Luc

 M.V. Yusenko, et al. Cancer Letters 479 (2020) 61–70 Fig. 1. Identification of monensin as a potent MYB inhibitor. A. Schematic illus- tration of the HEK-MYB-Luc reporter cell line. The carry a stably integrated MYB-inducible luciferase reporter gene, an expression vector for human MYB-2KR under the control of a modified CMV pro- moter with Tet-operator sites positioned close to the transcriptional start site and an expression vector for the Tet-repressor. The HEK-Luc cell line carries a constitutively activeluciferasereportergenedrivenbythe CMV promoter. B. HEK-MYB-Luc and HEK- Luccellsgrownfor12hinpresenceof1μg/ ml doxycyclin and the indicated con- centrations of monensin were analyzed for luciferase activity.    Columns show the mean fluorescence and viability with standard deviations, normalized to cells cultured without monensin. Asterisks indicate sta- tistical significance compared to the un- treated control (**p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, Student\'s t-te...
Read more

Prodigiosin induces autop- hagic alterations in human colon cancer cells

  C. Zhao, et al. Cancer Letters 481 (2020) 15–23 Fig. 1. Prodigiosin induces autop- hagic alterations in human colon cancer cells. (A) The chemical structures of prodi- giosin (PG). (B and C) Prodigiosin pro- motes LC3B-II accumulation. The cells were exposed to prodigiosin at the dosesindicatedfor12h.(B),ortreated with prodigiosin (0.2 μM) for the time periods indicated. (C), and cell lysates were analyzed using western blotting along with an anti-LC3B antibody. (D) Prodigiosin induces LC3B-II accumula- tion in multiple colon cancer cell lines. Three different lines of colon cancer cells were treated with prodigiosin (0.2 μM) for 12 h and the cells lysates were analyzed using western blotting. (E and F) Effect of prodigiosin on GFP- LC3B punctation. SW480 cells stably expressingEGFP-LC3weretreatedwith various concentrations of prodigiosin for 12 h. (E) or were treated with 0.2 μM prodigiosin for the different durations indicated (F), and the EGFP- LC3 puncta were observ...
Read more

MiR-342–3p is downregulated in PDAC tissues

 D. Zhu, et al. Cancer Letters 477 (2020) 107–121 Fig. 5. Dysbindin,a directtargetofmiR-342–3p, isnegatively regulatedbymiR-342–3pinPDAC.(A)Thetop5predictedcandidate miRNAs(miR-199a-5p,miR- 199b-5p,miR-182–5p,miR-377–3pandmiR-342–3p)targetingdysbindinaccordingtoTargetScansoftware.(B)Predictedpairingtothetargetregioninthe3′UTRof dysbindin(top)andthefivepredictedcandidatemiRNAs(bottom).(C)WesternblotanalysisshowingdysbindinproteinlevelsinAspc-1cellstransfectedwiththe fivecandidatemiRNAmimics(miR-199a-5p,miR-199b-5p,miR-182–5p,miR-377–3pandmiR-342–3p).Thedataarepresentedasthemean ± SEM.(D)AfterPDAC cells(Aspc-1,Capan-2andBxpc-3)weretransfectedwithmiR-342–3pmimicormimiccontrol,Westernblotanalysiswasperformedtodeterminedysbindinprotein levels.Thedataarepresentedasthemean ± SEM.(E)ThreepredictedbindingsitesofmiR-342–3pinthe3′UTRofdysbindinmRNA.MiR-342–3pdecreasedthe luciferaseactivityoftheWTdysbindinreporterbutnotthemutantreporter.Thedataarepresentedasthemean ± SEM.*P < 0.0...
Read more